Jevons, Yards. P., and you can Parker, M. T. (1964). J. din. Street., 17, 243-250. Lidwell, 0. Yards. (1959). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., 18,49-52. Live, I., and you can Nichols, A beneficial. C. (1961).J. shoot. Dis.,108, 195-204. Macdonald, A good. (1946). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., 5, 230-233. Meyer, W. (1966). Zentbl. Bukt. PurusitKde., We . Abt. Orig., 201,465-481. Meyer, W. (1967). J. Hyg., Camb., 65,439-447. Nakagawa, M. (1960). Jap. J. damp. Res., 8, 331-342. Oeding, P., and Williams, Roentgen. Elizabeth. 0. (1958). step three. Hyg., Cumb., 56, 445-454. Pagano, J. S., Farrer, S. Meters., Plotkin, S. A beneficial., Brachman, P. S., Fekety, F. Roentgen., and you will Pidcoe, V. (1960). Science, Letter.Y., 131, 927-928. Parker, Meters. T. (1966). For the “The newest Medical Base out of Medication Annual Comment” (J. P. Ross, ed.), pp. 157-173. University out-of London area, The latest Athlone Push, London area. Parker, M. T., Todinson, An effective. J. H., and Williams, R. E. 0. (1955). J. Hyg., Cumb., 53,458-473.
This new parasexual course and its particular include in genetic analysis
Pether, J. V. escort service S. (1968).J. Hyg., C a great d . , 66,605. Poole, P. M., and you can Baker, J. R. (1966). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., 25, 116-123. Declaration (1959). Int. Bull. bact. Nomencl.,9, 115-118. Declaration (1963). Int. Bull. bact. Nomencl., 13, 119-122. Statement (1967). Int. Bull. buct. Nomencl., 17, 113-125. Report (1971). Int. Bull. syst. Buct., 21, 165, 167, 171. Rountree, P. M. (1959). J. gen. Microbiol., 20,620-633. Rountree, P. Meters., and Asheshov, Elizabeth. H. (1961). J. gen. Microbiol., twenty-six, 111-122. Rountree, P. Yards., and you may Freeman, B. Yards. (1955). Med. J. Aust., dos, 157-161. Ruys, A beneficial. C., and you will Borst, J. (1959). Antonie wan Leeuwenhoek, twenty-five, 237-240. Seto, J. T., and you may Wilson, J. B. (1958). Are.step 3. wet. Res., 19, 241-246. Smith, H. W. (1948a).J. Hyg., C you d . , 46,7681. Smith, H. W. (1948b);Jp. Path. Ther., 58, 179-188. Smith, H. W. (1954).J. Path. Buc
Tarr, H. An excellent. (1958). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., 17, 64-72. A great. (1965). Veterinarian. Rec., 77, 477-480. Wentworth, B., Romig, W. R., and Dixon, W. J. (1964). J. contaminate. Dis.,114, 179188.
Williams, R. Age. 0. (1957). Zentbl. Bakt. PurasitKde., We . Abt. Orig., 168, 528-532. Williams, R. Age. O., and you can Jevons, Meters. P. (1961). Zentbl. Bukt. ParasitKde., I Abt. Orig., 181,349-358. Williams, Roentgen. E. O., and you may Rippon, J. Elizabeth. (1952). J. Hyg., Camb., 50, 320-353. Williams, Roentgen. E. O., Rippon, J. Elizabeth., and you will Dowsett, L. M. (1953). Lancet, we, 510-514. Wilson, Grams. S., and you will Atkinson, J. D. (1945). Lancet, i, 647-649.
Genetic Study during the Micro-organisms DAVID An effective. HOPWOOD John Znnes Institute, Norwikh, The united kingdomt We. Inclusion . 11. Segregation just like the Proof Simple Hereditary Manage . A. The fresh hereditary method of biology . B. This new detection out of segregation . 111. The foundation off Genetic Mapping . B. The fresh sequencing from loci into a good linkage chart: multi-factor crosses C. Linkagegroups . D. Hereditary okay-design . Age. Deletion mapping . IV. Functional Hereditary Testing . A great. Prominence screening . Bplementation testing . C. Epistasis . V. Hereditary Analysis when you look at the Eukaryotic Microbes . A great. Standard factors . step 1. 2. Tetrad analysis . B. Hereditary studies in particular organisms 1. Aspergillus nidulans . . 2. Aspergillus niger and other “imperfect” fungi step 3. Neurospora crassa . 4. Most other ascomycetes . 5. Yeasts . 6. Filamentous basidiomycetes . eight. Ustilago . 8. Chlamydomonas reinhardii . 9. Ciliates . 10. Slime moulds VI. Genetic Data in Prokaryotes . An effective. Standard considerations . step 1. Fertility systems and you may conjugational mapping . dos. Transduction and you will co-transduction . step 3. Sales and you can co-transformation 4. Non-selective study .
50 51 57 61 61 65 66 69 69 73 75 77 78 80 81 81 83 84 91 94
Watson, W
Genetic studies in particular organisms step one. Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhimurium or other Enteric germs . dos. Pseudomonas aeruginosa and you may Ps. putida . 3. Bacillus subtilis 4. Streptmyces coelicolor or any other actinomycetes . 5. Almost every other bacterium C. Official mapping strategies independent from recombination VII. Genetic Analysis during the Worms A good. General factors . 1. Particular widespread genomes dos. Features from virus genetics B. Genetic studies particularly viruses step one. Bacteriophages dos. Creature worms step 3. Plant worms VIII. Concluding Feedback Sources .